Skip Nav

Juvenile Justice System Essay

Popular Topics

❶National Council on Crime and Delinquency. This sounds contrary to that of the adults.

Juvenile justice system essay

Key Legal Decisions and Juvenile Justice Policy
The adult court system

All the testimonies and witnesses including the officer who arrested the youth are expected to say something at this stage. This is done in a criminal court after the intake officer, or the prosecutor has sent a waiver petition.

This will finally lead to other stages of prosecution and verdict given by the judge. In the case of an imprisonment statement, the juvenile is taken to a youths' prison different from the standard adult one. From the perspective of the defendant response guidelines, the adult court process and punishment is the most appropriate.

It is evident that the victim participated in a robbery while armed. According to Hahn, et al. It is necessary, therefore that a stern, similar and appropriate action be taken to criminals regardless of the age to make them learn and be a lesson to the remaining who may attempt to join the victim's school of thought.

Concisely, the court process is not equal due to consideration of various factors majorly age. This is an advantage to youth offenders since the law tends to be slightly soft on them giving them different options to enable them to retract and rejoin the healthy direction.

This sounds contrary to that of the adults. Boston College Type of paper: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Juvenile justice system essay In any jurisdiction, there are laws or rules put in place to govern all the activities of the region. The Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act of and the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of , both stress the importance of separation between noncriminal status offenders and those who are accused with criminal offences in terms of legal treatment. Further changes in legislation defined a strict line towards young offenders.

This approach involved, among others, reduced confidentiality for trial hearings which characterized the traditional juvenile justice system and contextual-based referral for criminal courts and adult correctional sanctioning in sharp contrast to the Act. That is, age alone is no longer the only parameter for the type of court and the subsequent procedures and punishment methods. These changes and others, which took place during the s, have positively affected the number of crimes committed by youth and reduced the number of juvenile murderers.

Nonetheless, despite the positive results of the punitive policies during the last decade, other findings may imply that this line may worsen the situation in the long run. Most of the criticism refers to the tendency to handle juvenile cases in the adult criminal justice and lockup systems, which may lead to increased criminal activities rather than reducing it.

Nevertheless, we should rethink and adjust the policies in reference to empirical evidence, in order to achieve the highest effectiveness of preventing juvenile offenders to lifetime criminals.

That is, the nature and circumstances of juvenile delinquency raise into discussion several main inherent moral and ethical dilemmas: The Legacy of Punitive Policy. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, pp. Youth under age 18 in the adult criminal justice system. The War on Drugs in the s also fueled the desire to get tough on crime and create a more punitive juvenile justice system.

Public fears mounted about youth who adopt a culture of violence. Despite subsequent acknowledgment that such fear was overstated, the public outcry made a lasting impression on the juvenile justice system and the way in which U.

By the end of the s, almost every state had enacted a law that made it easier for a juvenile to be tried in adult court and face adult sentences by lowering ages for transfer or waivers for violent crimes.

The trend toward a more conservative approach to juvenile justice continues, with the marked exception of the death penalty. In , the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma set the precedent for juvenile sentencing when the U. Supreme Court held that the execution of juveniles under the age of 16 was unconstitutional. As of , the United States was one of only a few countries to carry out the death penalty on those under age This changed in when, in Roper v.

This example Juvenile Justice System Essay is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need a custom essay or research paper on this topic please use our writing services.

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Juvenile Justice essays In the society we live in today, juvenile justice is a nation wide concern of law enforcement. However to what extent the laws and penalties used towards the youth of today has been a major focus of many criminologists and organizations around the nation.

Privacy FAQs

The Juvenile Justice System is defined as that "sociolegal process having responsibility and authority for public reaction to current juvenile delinquency and deterrence of future juvenile delinquency, including within that process the public and private agents, agencies, laws, rules, and policies having to do with juvenile delinquency"(Weiner.

About Our Ads

All those factors and others imply that the juvenile justice system should be coherently different from the adult criminal justice system. The rationale for behind giving special handling with young offenders is the idea of parens patriae (the state as parent). Juvenile Justice System Essay The U.S. juvenile justice system is currently designed to address the special needs of minors who engage in criminal acts but might not yet be held fully responsible for their behavior, as they .

Cookie Info

Juvenile justice system essay. In any jurisdiction, there are laws or rules put in place to govern all the activities of the region. Going against the rules means a court process exposure, which will determine what will happen at the end of the day. These courts exist in two forms, juvenile court for children under 18 years, and the adult court. This paper examines juvenile and criminal justice policies and practices with respect to young offenders who cross over from the juvenile to the criminal justice system. /5(10).